Tuesday, November 20, 2012

The FriendsReunited Conspiracy (?)– Part 7 – The Facts

In summary a group of people have been after me for years and have completed a 12-year investigation into the history of FR in an attempt to discredit me. They allege that we copied the idea from them through contact with a developer that they had engaged to write their website, and that we lied about our launch and have been doing so ever since. They have been contacting us on and off for 7 years.

Part 6 – The Connection
OK – so far the blogs have been all about these people. This one I’m afraid is going to be a bit boring and long. I’ve sort of gone to town on it so sorry if it’s a bit dull in places. 

Before I start, bear in mind this timing issue.  In order to have any chance of showing that we nicked the idea from them, these people need to be able to demonstrate that we did not come up with the FR idea before some time in July or August 2000 (when, they say, they disclosed the idea for their “innovative” web-based reunion concept to a developer).

Now read on…

The domain registration date and the invoice we showed them back in 2005 should have been ample proof to any reasonable person of our story, and put an end to everything. There was (and is) no reason why we should have to justify any more of our lives to these people.

However these people have crossed a line (as outlined in previous Blogs). And whilst I started to reminisce about how we started FR, I realised it was sort of quite fun and I began to enjoy it. Not the reason why I was doing it, but the gathering of information -  bit of FriendsReunited Reunited.

Also, in telling the story to friends and family involved around that time, a lot of them felt compelled to help and put pen to paper as well because they were as angry as me – and for that I am very grateful.

Now onto the history of FriendsReunited and the thing that these people are obsessed with but do little about - FACTS. All of this has been told to these people repeatedly over the years and a lot of it is in the public domain.

The idea

The story of how Julie came up with the idea has been well documented. In summary: in 1999, whilst she was pregnant, Julie managed using the Internet to track down a lost relative. This inspired her to think that the advent of the power of the web could be used to track down old school friends and find out what they were up to and where they were now.

We and Jason (who was my business partner already) were all in full time work. We had lots of other ideas contributed by friends or originated by ourselves. It wasn’t until after our daughter was born in January 2000 that Jason and I decided to give up our current contracts and have a go at some of the ideas.

I can get statements from dozens of people about these facts and what happened in 1999. Here is one example from a friend – I have many more.

“I remember at a friends gathering held at Barnet where Steve asked us to brainstorm ideas for websites, as he was thinking of changing directions in his career and wanted input. I had recently left South Wales and had just settled in my new home, placing this meeting in the Autumn months of 1999. At this meeting a number of ideas were put forward, one for a fantasy football site, another for retail service site for children’s parties, another for a light hearted daily picture site and another for getting in touch with your old school friends (Friends Reunited). This last one was suggested by Julie. The pregnancy had triggered wonderings and musings of the whereabouts and exploits of her former school friends. She was very enthusiastic about this it was clear to me this was an original idea born out by Julie due to her pregnancy.”

Jason and myself started playing around with some of the ideas for the rest of 1999 and with my daughter being born in January 2000 we were obviously very busy. 

Development

HappyGroup was formed around February 2000. Its plan was to try out lots of websites that we wrote ourselves, very quickly and very cheaply, to see if any had legs.

The school reunion idea that Julie had was one of these.

Four friends invested some seed money to enable us to try out our ideas. Each of them can provide proof of this and that the school reunion idea was one of the early ones. See below a statement from one of our first investors.

“I first met you and Jason in December 1994 when you started working for CTC on a contract basis. Over the next 6 years you were instrumental in developing CTC's initial internet based developments.
During that time we had many conversations about use of the web outside the financial services sphere in which CTC works. These culminated in the first quarter of 2000 with your proposals to set up the Happy Group to develop a number of ideas - which included the Friends Reunited website. My colleague and myself assisted you with the development of business plans and this culminated with our agreeing to provide you with part of the initial funding you needed in April 2000.”

I have three more investors with statements about their involvement.

We worked on a number of small sites, whilst still keeping down a reduced consultancy role. Around this time it became clear that Julie was not going to be able to get involved in actually developing the sites – originally the plan had been for her to learn these new skills whilst on maternity leave. But anyone who knows what it’s like to have a new baby will appreciate the demands of parenting.

In spring 2000 we bought our own server and rented out rack space and bandwidth in a small ISP called Aflex in NW London. A friend had recommended them to us.

At the same time in spring 2000 I started the early stages of writing the school reunion website. In was also around this time Julie decided on the name FriendsReunited. The site didn’t take long to write. I am a database developer not a graphic designer, so I knocked up very quickly the first version of the site ready to put live. There was no need for expensive design - that was our strategy - as we had no idea if people would actually use it.

Below is a statement by a work colleague and friend.

“Shortly after Steve left CTC in 2000, I was on my way ‘down south’ on business and arranged to meet him for lunch in Barnet on my way past. This would have been around May of that year, although I am uncertain of the exact date.  I met Steve at his house, my first visit there, prior to us going into town for lunch. Steve was keen to show me some of the sites that he and Jason (the Happy Group) had been working on and I was taken to the apocryphal ‘back bedroom’, which was actually at the front of the house! I recall the sites included a fantasy football site called ‘Half Time Orange’, a party bag retail site, I think called Party Bags, for Jason’s wife, and a fun site called ‘Men in Hats’ featuring Steve’s mate Colin. On the same occasion, Steve also showed me another site he was working on, which he referred to as ‘some silly idea Julie came up with’. I recall this information clearly as I have relayed this story on a number of occasions to friends for obvious reasons. Steve explained that when Julie was pregnant (their first child having been born in January 2000), they had been sitting on the sofa and she had been wondering what some of her school friends were doing, i.e. were they married, did they have children etc, she had suggested setting up a site that allowed you to get in touch with school friends. Steve had been working on it ‘on and off’, as it were, since. I was shown some of things that the site did i.e. the schools database that was on there and the register and search functionality, clearly quite a bit of work had gone into and it was a functioning site (although I must confess to some disinterest at the time as I had no desire to get in touch with anybody I went to school with and I was hungry!). However, Steve asked me to have a go at registering on the site, which I did and became, without realising it, the first ‘official’ member of Friends Reunited.”

This again is one of many friends prepared to provide statements, if required.

The Launch

We purchased the domain www.friendsreunited.co.uk through Aflex and it was registered on 30th June 2000. 

This FACT is available to the world through the Nominet register, which you can see on the WhoIs database.

Below is an email from Nominet received on 15th August 2012 that I asked them to confirm the details they had.

“I can confirm that the domain name was registered on 30 June 2000 in the name of Happygroup Limited, company number 3932836, the company changed name at companies house in March 2005 to Friends Reunited Limited and this was updated on our database in August 2009.”
  
From July 2000 the site was officially live.

I also have a very old laptop that has documents mentioning FR around the spring of 2000 all date stamped. I actually created the project as early as Feb 2000 but started coding in May 2000 – all the files are there. Plus we have been reading all the first emails we received from users from July 2000 – its actually been really good fun revisiting some of the first comments by users.


And here’s out first ever-marketing email we sent out to people – dated 24th July 2000.



FR was one of a few sites we were trying out as well as surviving doing a small consultancy job.

We started in our spare time to try and get people to find the site through various message boards. Registrations started to grow slowly. Over the next six months there was a slow but steady increase as we did more work promoting the site through message boards and as search engines started to pick up on it after a few months. By the end of the year we had just over 7,000 members.


Below is an email from the current Head of FriendsReunited at Bright Solid on 13th August 2012. [We sold FR in 2005 to ITV who have subsequently sold it onto BrightSolid. We have no formal connection with either ITV or Bright Solid]

“The guys have checked the member table and it shows the following monthly counts from July to December 2000:

Members   Date

114         2000-07-01 00:00:00.000 and 2000-08-01 00:00:00.000
654         2000-08-01 00:00:00.000 and 2000-09-01 00:00:00.000
1222       2000-09-01 00:00:00.000 and 2000-10-01 00:00:00.000
2269       2000-10-01 00:00:00.000 and 2000-11-01 00:00:00.000
1258       2000-11-01 00:00:00.000 and 2000-12-01 00:00:00.000
2131       2000-12-01 00:00:00.000 and 2000-12-31 00:00:00.000”

Just a further point here. Each and every one of these 7,662 registrations will have email addresses attached to them, so whilst a number of them will be defunct, a large number of people could be contacted and prove their registration – not that it will ever be needed. I am sure a lot of them are proud to be early pioneers of the site.

[And just as a further observation to the people who are pursuing us. To collect the above information on registrations took an email, followed by a phone call, and then it was sent to me – all in the space of an hour. Why I ask myself have these people not thought of pursuing these sort of lines of enquiry to prove our story rather than 12 years trying to prove something that didn’t happen ?]

The Hosting Switch

During autumn of 2000 we added more and more features to the site. It was clear that the site actually worked for people and we were onto something. Julie spent a lot of spare time now answering the emails that came in from the site, users asking for help, suggestions and emails of thanks.

One area that we were not happy with was the hosting. The service had intermittent problems of dropping out, and it was a long way from Jason, who lived in Kent, to support when issues arose. Jason was busy doing Happy Party Bags at this time but also was much more technically minded when it came to the servers than me. Therefore we decided to move to a new hosting company – Densitron – based near Jason which turned out to be a cheaper and better service long term.

Below is a statement from a technician from Densitron who helped with the move at the time.

“I know the (approximate) dates very well. You moved to us when we were supposed to open the new data centre (November 2000), but we had delays and didn't open in the end until Feb 2001.
I know this for a fact because I remember helping Jason move your server from our old data centre to our new facility just before you had your first mention on Steve Wright.”

The Re-design

The other area that we clearly also needed to improve was the design. I got a friend who was a graphic designer to knock up a new skin around November 2000 and started the work of improving the site’s functionality, adding lots of new features. These were put live around December 2000.

I am still in touch with our graphic designer and they still have the original PC with all the old and new files on it with relevant date stamps. They were also using the FR site around this time.

2001 and beyond

Registrations were still growing nice and steady.

In January 2001 a journalist from The Net magazine contacted us. He had found the site. He did an interview and photo shoot with Julie back at her old school. 

The feature came out in the March 2001 edition of The Net and here it is.



Also, in January 2001, we were mentioned as website of the day by Miles Mendoza on the Steve Wright show on BBC Radio 2. [I don’t think we need to provide proof of this FACT.]

The effect of this was obvious. It caused a massive spike in our traffic and registrations. As a result of this and continued growth FR went on to become one of the biggest websites in the UK, and the rest is history.

As you can see from the above there is nothing but FACT. This is the 18-month period that we are alleged to have lied about, and continued to cover up. All of these people would happily give testimony under oath – not that it would ever be needed. And there are many others waiting who would also like to give evidence. I also have lots of other evidence that I could use if I had the time or inclination. 

I think this is the END of the matter in terms of FACTUAL information.

You may ask why I haven’t done this before. I helped these people a lot initially, and provided more than ample proof of these facts – this took up my time trying to prove 18 months of my life. I did ask myself why should I waste time on people who never believe anything I say anyway. However after that email and their document were sent and seeing the extent that they went to, I decided enough is enough. 

Of course, I can probably already guess what these peoples’ response to all these FACTS will be. Our friends are all part of the conspiracy of course. The data provided could be back entered or setup by me all those years ago. It’s all a setup, conspiracy and cover up. We bribed Nominet. The file screen shots could be doctored. Blah blah blah.

But one final message to these people - be aware that these statements above are just a tip of the iceberg. There are numerous others who are very keen to give statements and provide further proof of the truth of our story. Any attempt to discredit these statements could have serious consequences. That’s not a threat. It’s FACT.

Coming Next – The FriendsReunited Conspiracy (?) – Part 8 – The Crime

@spankyhurst

Thursday, November 15, 2012

The FriendsReunited Conspiracy (?)– Part 6 – The Connection


In summary a group of people have been after me for years and have completed a 12-year investigation into the history of FR in an attempt to discredit me. They allege that we copied the idea from them through contact with a developer that they had engaged to write their website and that we lied about our launch and have been doing so ever since. They have been contacting us on and off for 7 years. In August we received an email and a 21-page summary of their investigation.

For background to this story read:
Part 1 - Introduction
Part 2 – The Claim
Part 3 – The Contact
Part 4 – The Email
Part 5 – The Document

The main part of their claim is that we knew the developer that they were going to use for their own website back in 2000, and that he told us their idea and we went onto copy it.

After 12 years of investigation, 120 pages of notes, numerous private investigators, friends, solicitors, police officers, and many more people and probably hundreds of man-hours, the proof of our connection with this developer is listed below on the next page. (Please scroll down)





















































That’s it

That’s the proof they have found – nothing – a blank page.

I told them from first contact that I did not know and had never met this person,. However, like everything else I was not believed on this. You would have thought by now after 12 years that the lack of evidence was proof enough. Of course you can’t prove something that didn’t happen, but they now propose to create a website, put up a 250K reward (jaw drop!) for information and to use social marketing to try and find a link that doesn’t exist.

It seems so strange that all their efforts were put into this one act. Why did they not try and use their resource to try and confirm anything about the history of FR that is in the public domain.

I am a big believer in the theory of 6-degrees of separation. Where everyone is connected to everyone through 6 different people. I believe there are probably many connections between their developer and me – in fact it should be a lot less than 6. Think about it – we are both developers and live in the SE of England. That should be easy to find a spurious link or two. Or so you would think. I hope they haven’t paid too much to their various private investigators.

However, I would like to come to the rescue and save a lot of time and money.

When I knew I was meeting one of these people (lets call him Mr A) earlier this year, I spent half an hour the night before trying to find Mr A on LinkedIn. It didn’t take long.

And there down the right hand side of the screen is LinkedIn’s very own 6-degree style connection. It had me -> connected to one of my contacts -> connected to one of Mr A’s contacts -> connected to Mr A and the main person behind all of this.

A connection in 3 degrees.

And since Mr A employed their developer back in 2000 when this all started, then he is connected to the developer.

I found the link.

I printed it out and showed him the next day. I don’t think he got the irony.

Can I claim my £250,000 now please.

Coming Next – The FriendsReunited Conspiracy (?) – Part 7 – The FACTS behind FriendsReunited

@spankyhurst


Monday, November 12, 2012

The FriendsReunited Conspiracy (?) – Part 5 – The Document


In summary a group of people have been after me for years and have completed a 12-year investigation into the history of FR in an attempt to discredit me. They allege that we copied the idea from them through contact with a developer that they had engaged to write their website and that we lied about our launch and have been doing so ever since. They have been contacting us on and off for 7 years. In August we received an email and a 21-page summary of their investigation.

For background to this story read:
Part 1 - Introduction
Part 2 – The Claim
Part 3 – The Contact
Part 4 – The Email

The document I received attached to that Email don’t forget was a summary of a 120-page document of the complete investigation. They haven’t shown me this – on one hand I would love to peruse it, to see what more these people have been up to.  However, if its anything like the summary then perhaps best I don’t see it.

I received the 21-page document in August this year, whilst on holiday with my family. It took me 24 hours to find a laptop that would open it as it was in an old version of Word. Once I did and started reading it I could not believe what I was seeing.

For most of the previous seven years I thought these people had gone away – that’s what they led me to believe in 2005. However, the things they did, the tactics they used, the people they allege to have involved is mind blowing. I couldn’t actually read the document from start to finish as it made me so angry on nearly every page.

I have to admit here that for the first time I lost it. Yes I had got angry previously at their communication and insinuation, but this was unbelievable. Some of the things made me feel physically sick. I decided it was best I take a break from my family holiday, as I didn’t want the kids to see me stressed and angry. Thanks for that, guys!

And the reason for my anger, apart from the allegations against me, was the tactics – following people; recording my conversations, turning up at friends’ houses and hassling them and then calling them liars; phoning friends and harassing them; warping things we said to suit their agenda;  the use of a fraud squad officer to investigate us; use of home office officials, senior police officers, legal experts, solicitors, authors…. You get the gist.

I started by going through their 21-page summary document line by line and making comments. You can imagine how slow a process this is. However, by the conclusion I realised a number of things.

Firstly, after 12 years there isn’t a shred of evidence to support any of these people’s wild claims, as I would have expected (given that their claims are utterly untrue). This is after 12 years of investigations, use of numerous supposed experts and lots – maybe hundreds - of man-hours.

Secondly, the document itself is all over the place in its comments, questions and summaries. I could not even work out what they were suggesting we did in places as it keeps changing its mind.

Thirdly, it is just full of sections of transcripts from conversations, emails, phone conversations and meetings. A lot is out of context and ALL the conclusions are based on these peoples’ strange interpretation of what peoples’ answers, written and spoken, mannerisms and body language mean. A single hesitation, a simple negative answer, a mistake, a hint of anger all become a scripted cover-up or lie. It is classic conspiracy stuff.

And finally, they had concentrated almost completely on trying to find a link between ourselves and their developer, and in trying to disprove the one fact, namely our URL registration date, that should have put a lid on this at the start. They at no point tried to gain proof behind any of our well documented history of FR – as I will show later in another blog, a simple email and phone call to the current owners of FR would have given them easily-accessible concrete evidence of our start date – why hadn’t they thought of doing this at any time?

I decided it was pointless directly answering any of the points, because these people would then do the usual and twist them to suit the conspiracy they allege to have taken place.

It appears a lot of people had been roped into this investigation – family friends, fraud squad officer, an author, private investigators, senior police officers, a Home Office director, ‘leading’ legal experts, various solicitors to name some of those who are mentioned. The list is incredible. However, I sort of sympathise with them all. If you were blind to the whole story and read their document as I was given it – with lots of information missing and with everything we said or did massaged into the conspiracy – then I can sort of see someone might say “You might be onto something there”.

However, that’s where my sympathies stop.  Did any one of these people, I wonder, just stop and ask the question: is there a chance that we might have been telling the truth all along and there was no conspiracy ?

Back to the document – I am not going to publish it. I would love to. However too many people are mentioned who don’t deserve to get pulled into this. It also has many legal aspects, which I am still looking into and will pursue.

Apart from the legal elements – upon which I may do a separate blog – I have pages on sections of just ludicrous stuff. The Ridiculous as I call it will form a very long blog in a week or 2.

I cant believe anyone has really given the go ahead to release this document – its so full of unbelievable claims that at best make the author look embarrassing and at worst put the author in legal quicksand if published.

Coming Next – The FriendsReunited Conspiracy (?) – Part 6 – The Connection

@spankyhurst

Friday, November 9, 2012

The FriendsReunited Conspiracy (?) – Part 4 – The Email


In summary a group of people have been after me for years and have completed a 12-year investigation into the history of FR in an attempt to discredit me. They allege that we copied the idea from them through contact with a developer that they had engaged to write their website, and that we lied about our launch and have been doing so ever since. They have been contacting us on and off for 7 years.

For background to this story read:
Part 1 - Introduction
Part 2 – The Claim

Let me just state my utter contempt for the email and document that we received on 11th August 2012.

Lets just go straight into the email:

“To Steve,

I have attached a (moderated) copy of a 21 page summary of events surrounding my 12 year investigation into the launch of your website. I'd like to offer you 36 hours to preview the summary, just in case you have anything new to add, or perhaps you might like to reconsider some of your earlier comments?

In a few days I will have emigrated from the UK so I have had to use my youngest sons's e-mail address. Once I am overseas, the Investigation will continue in the care of my 2 sons who, after a continued research, aim to find the social connection with the Developer. At the same time, an extensive national marketing campaign will be initiated by them, in the following order:

1. The summary will be released by my 2 sons, to 20,000 students at their respective Universities, initiating a viral marketing campaign.
2. Then it will appear on a new and bespoke "Reward for Information" website, with a £250k reward offered for information.
3. After a few weeks, the full findings will be shared with national media.
4. A book is being commissioned, by a recognised UK author (family friend) pending the final outcomes of the investigation.

The summary has been put together from facts received over 12 years of detailed investigation. The facts are then supported by my own, personal observations; even if you find them distasteful, there is nothing libellous or illegal.”


Now for my comments on this email.
What the %$£@ %*&£ ^%£@ *&%$ *&^% (sorry my kids read my blogs sometimes)

·               36 hours – are they serious? This is 12 years of investigation and maybe hundreds of man-hours of work they are asking me to review. I ignored the deadline of course.

·               This is just a 21-page summary – how many pages are in the full document? (a previous letter states that they have over 120 pages of material)

·               I have blanked out the name of the developer. This person has done nothing wrong and all he did was not write a system for these people. They have hassled him previously too. As I do not know him I don’t think it is fair to draw him into this.

·               We find it strange they provide this now after 12 years just as one of them is apparently emigrating from the country, leaving what could well become a nasty mess behind for his sons.

·               The 4 points they list are quite frankly rather threatening

·               The reward offered has created a jaw-dropping moment for everyone who has seen it. It is an absurd amount of money. We would have been shocked even if it was a tenth of that amount. I cannot even say it without doing a Dr Evil impersonation.

·               Having read the document, in reality it contains no pertinent facts and contains much that would, if published, be libelous, as well as disclosing the use of illegal methods in their vain search for material that would discredit us.

·               And yes, I do find them distasteful in the extreme

Lets leave this one at that shall we – I am not sure what else there is to say about an email like that, but you can imagine I could write a lot more and a lot worse.

Coming next – The FriendsReunited Conspiracy (?) – Part 5 – The Document

@spankyhurst